Hotel Gadabout header image 2

Climate Extremism: The Director’s Cut

November 25th, 2009 · 9 Comments

2012    

  I’ve been festering away here in my lounge room for three weeks now. Flat on my back at times on a three inch thick foam mattress on the floor with no television. Imagine opening a door into my brain and peering inside. Well this morning I’ve found myself imagining a block buster disaster movie of which I am going to start writing as soon as I finish this. Not that you will see it of course, its top secret. But in thinking through the concepts I have come across some hard-hitting questions, the first of which is completely irrelevant to this blog:

 

Did someone called ‘Stan’ really win Australian Idol?

 

And….

 

What if we are moving into a global cooling phase rather than global warming?

 

Imagine your children’s children’s children’s children. All huddled around a fire in threadbare clothing, trying desperately to get some heat into frostbitten fingers. The oceans are freezing, the Antarctic and Arctic have doubled in size and there is a population explosion of penguins. They are taking over the globe, claiming copyright infringement for Happy Feet even. The Australian mammals suffer the same fate as the megafauna did 20,000 years before them. They no longer exist. Conifers dominate the mainland and all but one eucalypt is clinging to life, smuggled to Cuba which is now the size of Australia. And kiwis flood the Australian population (wait a second) as they no longer fake resumes then fly over the pacific to work the mines. They simply drive over. In fact sea levels are so low that you’ve been able to drive to Jakarta for the last 50 years and Hawaii is only split from the mainland by a large inland lake. And did I mention the Australian population is now predominantly Muslim?

 

Sounds like a disaster movie doesn’t it? It sounds unreal. Well let’s tie it back to reality by asking this question:

 

What if Kevin Rudd’s Emission Trading Scheme legislation is passed by the senate?

 

What if my generation embraced this scheme based on the current “human induced climate change” rhetoric? Sounds unreal doesn’t it?  What if democratic governments around the world got together and started a carbon credit trading scheme whereby green producers with no emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) are given credit. And mining companies, smelters, and the average person emitting CO2 have to buy credit. How much can you afford to fart in one day? This is the right moment to mention the following facts about CO2, that hapless gas that will drive this trade.

 

CO2 in the atmosphere is only 0.001% of the total CO2 in the ocean, rocks, air, soil and life (The Spectator).

 

Present day CO2 content is at the lowest it’s been since the beginning of time (ABC AM Program).

 

Maybe we should be farting more…

 

So lets say “Eco Guilt”, what Ian Plimer claims to be a “first world luxury”, is continually shoved down our throats by the media and whoever feels the need (and a lot seem to feel the need), and the Emission Trading Scheme gets passed in the senate. Farmers start paying up, the mining industry pays up big, petrol prices sore…. well commodity prices sore in general. Forget cheap return flights from Sydney to Melbourne! The mining industry is crippled, brought to its greasy knees. The farming industry will survive as the Wheat Board and co are already on their knees (clutching Kevin by the hips no less). Oil, gas, coal mining, any mining, dries up as we focus our attention on the new more profitable “green energies”, like wind and solar.

 

But alas… these “green energies” are already temperamental at best. Sure it’s windy, it’s frigging windy, but at minus 40 degrees centigrade the turbine continues to freeze-up. That and the giant albatross continue to fly into the blades causing hours and hours of downtime. And those millions of dollars spent on solar panels prove wasted as they are useless once buried by snow and ice. So Australia’s Soviet style winter creeps on, but we don’t even have wiper fluid to drink in place of vodka, as the car industry crapped itself years ago.

 

It’s a dire, unforgiving, over-the-top scenario. But is it too different to the scare campaigns put forward by the extreme environmentalists of the last few years?

 

In Al Gores new book: “Our Choice: A plan to solve the climate crisis” he has conveniently included a map of earth on the cover, as it looks today. This unfolds to a picture of earth ravished by unchecked global warming (The Examiner). His artwork features a storm over Florida spinning in a clockwise motion, which is impossible in the northern hemisphere. But even more ludicrous is the hurricane over the equator. Is Al Gore implying that “human induced global warming” will spin the entire earth of its axis? This is far more over-the-top than my above “global cooling” scenario.

 

Other misgivings in Al’s amateurish artwork centre around Cuba appearing completely submerged, thus implying a sea level rise of 6580 feet, thats over 2000 metres about as high as Mt Kosciuszko (far more than the not so conservative 20 feet predicted by the IPCC!) This means the UK, the mother country of all places, would be completely submerged. And with it series four of Little Britain.

 

So do we need to worry about the current doomsday environmental extremism? Will an entire population of Australians be manipulated by the media to such a degree that carbon trading will soon be a reality? Should I listen to the (seemingly) masses and race out to Bunnings this weekend, grab a sausage sizzle before they become extinct soon, and some timber and nails to start building my ark?

 

Can I pose the following important question?

 

Did the German population question the ideals of the Nazi movement? How did a civilized population allow six million Jews die?

 

And here’s a word: “Mansonism“.

 

I am going to watch arguably the “biggest” disaster movie ever made tonight. Big in terms of the actual disaster. A “Mansonite” review I read last night of 2012 complained about the lack of a link to “human induced global warming”. Well that’s why I am going to watch it… for pure guilt free cataclysmic disaster.

 

 

 “for human arrogance to think that we can actually change the way the planet operates is really quite laughable” Ian Plimer

Tags: The World

9 responses so far

  • 1 Alison // Nov 25, 2009 at

    Good one mate, the whole ETS idea stinks & is going to make a few select individuals VERY rich (including Mr Gore). We’ll see how all the masses like it when everything goes up in price significantly & ‘climate change’ (as we now don’t use “global warming”) continues! Have you read Ian’s book yet? I’m slowly making my way through it, he’s also going to be the dinner speaker at the Sydney Basin Symposium next year if you’re interested. Oh & I enjoyed the interview transcript you sent me!

  • 2 Haynesy // Nov 25, 2009 at

    nicely put mate. Just as I was starting to feel like a climate change infidel the backlash is slowly starting to gain some publicity. Of course unemotional scientific debate is not possible with the purveyors or the new great secular religion. Ian Pilmer’s book was quite interesting (even if he does bang on a bit) and put things in perspective nicely.
    I will remind you though that in an earlier episode of Hotel you were telling us all to stop farting. I’m glad that with your new attitude my morning baked beans are now safe

  • 3 admin // Nov 26, 2009 at

    Haynesy - “stop farting”…? I can assure you my tongue was wedged squarely in my cheek ;-)

    For those interested “Fart Hour” will go up against “Earth Hour” again next year (in April). In light of the current blog I have not decided whether we will refrain from farting for the hour… or fart continuously for the hour.

    http://www.hotelgadabout.com/20090401/fart-less-save-the-planet/

  • 4 admin // Nov 26, 2009 at

    Alison - yes business is booming; led by our very own Minister for Climate Change and Water… Penny Wong. Wont she look the fool one day…

    No I haven’t read Heaven + Earth yet, but count me in for the Symposium dinner (need to catch-up with Robbie O too).

    What bugs me the most is how biased the interviewing of Ian Plimer is. It is hard to tell based on a transcript how heated the Lateline interview became but Tony Jones has an obvious hidden agenda.

    Other interview transcripts I have read would be quite aggressive but also obviously (and sometimes subliminally) biased in other ways. Notice how at the end of the ABC AM interview “Climate Change Scientist” Professor Barry Brook is slipped in (presumably after Ian Plimer has left the studio) to attempt to discredit Plimer.

    And this is the ABC… if we cannot depend on Aunty to be unbiased… then where do we source our information?

    Robyn Williams on Radio National is one example of unbiased reportage: http://www.abc.net.au/rn/ockhamsrazor/stories/2009/2716078.htm

    And here is a link to the overtly biased Lateline interview:
    http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2008/s2554129.htm

  • 5 admin // Nov 26, 2009 at

    And more on the media… watch this clip…

    http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=GdqGaGqG2G

    Did this get much coverage in Australia? I have no TV! I know when it was first reported on the net it was from a “those naughty denialists hacking into our emails” perspective.

  • 6 Paul // Nov 27, 2009 at

    Hi Wendy
    This topic has highlited the stupidity and greed of the average australian. The masses have accepted the ETS as a good method for addressing “climate change” but now that the Libs and Nats have mentioned that it will cost $1100/year the public are starting to ask questions. Frigging greedy sheep, if there was a genuine threat to the future of the planet (well the atmosphere that is, people forget that there is a core, mantle etc when the expression “planet” is used) I would comfortably cough up the required money but, fortunately, AGW is a load of rubbish. Look out for some rediculous add campaign that includes information on “cheap renewable energy” despite that fact that where they are used (California) that are up to 25 times more expensive than nuclear and hydro. Google US Congressman Rep Tom McClintock.

  • 7 admin // Nov 29, 2009 at

    Paul - I agree, it highlights stupidity and greed but I am finding the dogma and censorship more frightening. The New York Times (among others) refused to report on “Climategate”. And Environmentalist David Bellamy has been dumped by the BBC for merely questioning the so called “science” behind AGW.

    The essence of science is to question… isn’t it?

    The “masses” have accepted ETS for a reason. They have been brainwashed by biased information. AGW has become a religion with no relation to science. And it’s led by extreme fundamentalists in the league of those that want to ban Darwin’s theories from being taught in schools.

    We would have to question how democratic this country truly is if carbon trading becomes a reality.

  • 8 admin // Dec 2, 2009 at

    LATEST UPDATE: We have a blockage!

    http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/newshome/6537878/senate-expected-to-reject-ets/

    Bye bye K Rudd…

  • 9 Paul // Dec 6, 2009 at

    K Rudd is blocked hahahaha. Penny Wong, the Minister of Fictional Science, has nothing to control other than her subservient elected party members that aren’t allowed to have an opion.
    Fortunetly Obama has been “blocked” on all legislation, including an ETS, he has proposed since being elected to president. Hopefully the ETS is also blocked in NZ.

Leave a Comment